Notice to all Users - Page 6

**Cyrus** · 02-23-2008, 07:28 AM

Oh, uh no. Where did you get that? I am just saying if users and even staff are to decide if anyone doesn't make it into the new UG, which apparently won't happen, it would have to be based on, "He/Se spammed his way into UG", rather than, "I don't like this person"

Plausible Evidence.

**Fewmitz** · 02-23-2008, 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crunnk&&Fitch

Oh, uh no. Where did you get that? I am just saying if users and even staff are to decide if anyone doesn't make it into the new UG, which apparently won't happen, it would have to be based on, "He/Se spammed his way into UG", rather than, "I don't like this person"

Plausible Evidence.

And what exactly makes you think it WOULDN'T be based on quality of time spent here?

xpinklemon · 02-23-2008, 03:41 PM

that's a great idea *nods*

Fake Death · 02-23-2008, 03:41 PM

I like it, means people can't spam and a few posts here and there.

Note, when someone says they don't like someone...most of the time they spam stupid shit.

~~*FireWrath*~~ · 02-23-2008, 03:45 PM

I'd also like to see an IQ test before being able to even apply for the UnderGround section :/

Fake Death · 02-23-2008, 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FireWrath

I'd also like to see an IQ test before being able to even apply for the UnderGround section :/

Wrong, wow i think you need one.

Common this is the I-net, everyone can cheat?

Inless YOU want to call people or something to do this IQ test.

Don't care if you were playing around...tbh.

**nomhak** · 02-23-2008, 04:10 PM

Fake Death you need a grade 3 spelling test.

This is not a thread for debating as to why you feel this is a good/bad implementation, quite frankly anyone's opinion on the matter holds little to no weight because its being implemented either way. Utterly useless posts congratulating the implementation of these new rules will result in infractions.

Unless you got suggestions to either change the way this will happen, forge a new method of determining Underground users worthy, or a reason as to why this is utterly useless, then don't post.

~~*FireWrath*~~ · 02-23-2008, 04:17 PM

How about a rep requirement of say somewhere between 1-3? Any idiot can just post meaningless crap but not necessarily "spam," and the UnderGround should be a place for users that do deserve to be there. Since reputation can somewhat determine whether a user is helpful at all, I see no reason why there shouldn't be a requirement for it.

**InSane** · 02-23-2008, 05:14 PM

well thats the point of the applications. i dont think you need the rep requirements because not everyone gets rep

~~*FireWrath*~~ · 02-23-2008, 05:17 PM

That's what I thought, too, but also not everybody helps. I can have say 250 posts and apply, and get in simply because I've been here for a while and I didn't exactly spam.