Set limits on iTrader.

[G.I.R.]

I also recall there being something about no iTrader for lending/avatar services.

I don't think we need limits on iTrader. They are meant to show successful trades, and even if they are small trades, a trade is a trade is it not? If people would just use a damn middleman for the trades, we really wouldn't need an iTrader system in the first place. Part of me doesn't know why we still do. But yes, we should all be intelligent enough to check the other person's iTrader log and NOT Trade if something seems out of the ordinary. Common sense?

[Grandmaster]

Well, trade ratings are only meant to be a reference for trading. I don't really see the point of regulating trade ratings. Currently, only unique trade ratings are counted so even if you do small trades, but if you can trade successfully with so many people, then you are quite trustworthy already. If you do large trades and only did with few people, your trustworthiness can still be questioned. What if you decide to scam on the next large trade? As for who would go first in terms of trade ratings, it also varies from situation to situation. If you are doing large trade and is insecure about it, you can always use middleman or tell the person to go first because you are using real cash. If not, just withdraw the offer.

[G.I.R.]

As for who would go first in terms of trade ratings, it also varies from situation to situation. If you are doing large trade and is insecure about it, you can always use middleman or tell the person to go first because you are using real cash. If not, just withdraw the offer.

No. Use a middleman period. There is no 'going first' to it, otherwise when you do get scammed, you're shit out of luck and the most we'll do is ban the other person.

[samstah]

Like it's already been said in this thread - USE A MIDDLEMAN.
Our job is to specifically prevent you from getting scammed. Whether you're trading with somebody with 0 itrader or 20 itrader. Use us and you'll be ok.

Board closed!