war on terror or war against humanity

scylantdeath · 01-18-2008, 03:04 PM

i think its both its in humain whats going on out there

sarfraz · 01-20-2008, 02:41 AM

Not much of a debate going on here.

soltehrb · 01-20-2008, 08:01 AM

That's a stupid question. Next time, think for yourself, don't just take up you ignorant parents belifs. War is necessary for true peace. Just because It's not against an actual country doesn't make it wrong.

**Snakebite** · 01-20-2008, 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by soltehrb

That's a stupid question. Next time, think for yourself, don't just take up you ignorant parents belifs. War is necessary for true peace. Just because It's not against an actual country doesn't make it wrong.

<3
Scylantdeath isn't very smart though.
In my mind hes one of those ignorant war mongers, who thinks killing thousands of innocent people is the "RIGHT" thing to do.
I'm sure he wants Bush to stay Prez.

scylantdeath · 01-20-2008, 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snakebite

<3
Scylantdeath isn't very smart though.
In my mind hes one of those ignorant war mongers, who thinks killing thousands of innocent people is the "RIGHT" thing to do.
I'm sure he wants Bush to stay Prez.

see that just wrong bush needs do go he's a dumb ass

so wait your saying that you like the fact that thousand of people are dieing out there and that thousands or troop are getting sent to the nut farm and ruining their life???

**KaosKinesis** · 01-21-2008, 11:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scylantdeath

see that just wrong bush needs do go he's a dumb ass

so wait your saying that you like the fact that thousand of people are dieing out there and that thousands or troop are getting sent to the nut farm and ruining their life???

You are a very uneducated individual.

How dare you claim that the "thousands" of American's lost in this so called war is anything to be focused on. What about the 500,000+ Men, Women AND children the U.S. is slaughtering in the Middle East?

Also, you have to be a pretty ignorant person to believe that there are any actual "terrorists" that provoked this "war." Such a blessing it is to have an enemy that can't ever be defeated, for it doesn't exist.

**Snakebite** · 01-22-2008, 12:02 AM

Kaos

Despite the writing, he'll just TL;DR, and continue to be ignorant.

~~*MIKEaC*~~ · 01-22-2008, 11:56 AM

1 war is necessary sometimes and not other times
2 iraq needed changing and sadam needed to die not necesarily at that time wen therewere other more important things going on
3 there will never truly be peace with or without war ppl will still hate kill and descriminate regardless

**Snakebite** · 01-22-2008, 12:17 PM

Lots of things need changing killing like 60,000 innocent people doesn't seem like the best idea.
And I'm sure there will be a hell of a lot more peace with no war.

**KaosKinesis** · 01-22-2008, 03:26 PM

1- War is and always will be man's resolution to any problem.

2- Uhh, the Middle East did not need to change. Aside from control of Crude Oil, one of the only other real reasons we went to "free" Iraq was because Saddam, as well as other Middle Eastern countries, were considering changing their international trade dollar to the Euro, instead of the U.S. Dollar. This would harm the U.S. economy even more than now. The invasion of Iraq was meant to be a warning to any country considering changing to the Euro.

3- Peace is boring. :P