Hatz vs Jackie

[Roxas.]

Hatz:


Jackie:


First to 7.
Post reason why in format.
EX:
+ comp
+ color
+ flow
+ depth
- text

[jackiegarrett,*]

there's no poll up ;o

[Roxas.]

There isn't going to be a poll. Just post who get's your vote and why, using the format I posted.

[Cyrus]

Jackie

+/- comp
+ color
+ flow
+ depth
+ text
+ lighting

I am kind of 50/50 on comp.

[Oraski]

My vote goes to Jackie

+ comp
+ color
+ flow
- depth
+ text

Your defiantly improving Hatz though :]

[sphinxen]

I'm voting Jackie.

And I don't know how to express myself in your format, so I'll just have to use full sentences this time.. both the sigs are good, I like the fonting on both as well. The reason why I chose Jackie is that there is more contrast which makes it more appealing to the eye.

[Sejiru]

Fuck your format Hatz. It limits reasons as I would use to vote and this forum isn't active enough that I need to merely skim my thoughts out to you in a rush to vote in all the battles going on.

I vote Jackie the appeal is definitely there and the composition, style considered, was done semi-good and colors certainly give her a boost over yours. Your composition on the other hand was severely lacking and was far too simplistic you seem to lack an understanding of how to add subtle yet appealing effects and I'd recommend you work more on that. The smudging, flow, and background don't blend at all it was nearly a shock to see this done by you Hatz. I'd have expected better :\

[Roxas.]

Keep on topic.
The topic is not, people that make sigs steal art.

And I didn't know I did so bad on this one. D:

[lil]

I prefer Jackie's signature. It looks professional, as opposed to her "leader" competition. Way to go, Jackie

[Antivenom]

Jackie GMV

+ comp
+ color
+ flow
- depth
- text