GG Authorization

[Bump J]

My Version Of GG Auth

Go to Project>Refrences and check Microsoft XML, v3.0

Dim Wrapper As ServerXMLHTTP30
Dim strHTML As String

Private Sub Form_Load()
Set Wrapper = New ServerXMLHTTP30
End Sub

Private Sub cmdDoAuth_Click()
    Me.Caption = "Step 1..."
    Wrapper.open "POST", "http://www.gaminggutter.com/login.php?do=login"
    Wrapper.setRequestHeader "Content-Type", "application/x-www-form-urlencoded"
    Wrapper.send "vb_login_username=" & txtUser.Text & "&vb_login_password=" & txtPass.Text & "&s=&do=login&vb_login_md5password=&vb_login_md5password_utf="
    strHTML = ""
    strHTML = Wrapper.responseText
    
    If InStr(1, strHTML, "Thank you for logging in") = 0 Then
        MsgBox "Failed To Login"
        
    ElseIf InStr(1, strHTML, "Thank you for logging in") <> 0 Then
    
        Me.Caption = "Step 2..."
        Wrapper.open "GET", "http://www.gaminggutter.com/neopets-f54.html"
        Wrapper.send
        strHTML = ""
        strHTML = Wrapper.responseText
        
        If InStr(1, strHTML, "permission to access this page") <> 0 Then
            MsgBox "Your Not Authorized"
        ElseIf InStr(1, strHTML, "permission to access this page") = 0 Then
            MsgBox "Authorized"
        End If
    End If
End Sub

[Rambo]

Its very simple, and very bog-standard VB6 coding.

If someone was looking to be malicious they could mod the code to take the details of the user.

I would recommend people do not use this login.

[second2none]

Rambo that comment is not needed dude. Bullseye is an awesome programmer.

Any code can be made malicious.

[Nitech]

Zomg, not really kane.

You can always md5; you can always do an auto-redirect;

yet, instr's & gets aren't the way to go.. try to make a DLL

[Zack]

Originally Posted by Rambo

Its very simple, and very bog-standard VB6 coding.

If someone was looking to be malicious they could mod the code to take the details of the user.

I would recommend people do not use this login.

As, Kane has mentioned flaming generically is uneeded espescially in a programming topic where constructive criticism is everything.

[Rambo]

I was not intending to flame the programmer then, and if it came across offensive I am sorry.

However, like Nitech has mentioned, MD5 the passwords and then it should be somewhat more secure, unless people can de-hash them.

I would also like to point out to Zack, that if he does not stop following me around this board, I may do something I regret, so please stop.

[Zack]

I'm not following you around the board, Ian.

Anyway, what would you ban me for?

Originally Posted by Rambo

I was not intending to flame the programmer then, and if it came across offensive I am sorry.

However, like Nitech has mentioned, MD5 the passwords and then it should be somewhat more secure, unless people can de-hash them.

I would also like to point out to Zack, that if he does not stop following me around this board, I may do something I regret, so please stop.

The encryption method doesn't mean too much when the whole concept can be extracted and removed from the program completely. If you posted code to a verification I couldn't render useless I'd be impressed.

[nomhak]

I just want to say! (I don't understand a word any of you are speaking other then one issue)

I didn't see any flame whatsoever, alike the GFX section, comments and critiquing can be made, if you can't (not referring to you Bump because you haven't even said anything to appear harassed by the comment) take it, then you got to toughen up.

I don't know what "past" problems Zack and Rambo have, (well I vaguely remember zack saying something) but I don't care, as long as it stays off the boards so play nicely

[second2none]

Yeah really vlad... If you really want someones password & username its not that hard to get with a program dude.

This is what rambo said..

If someone was looking to be malicious they could mod the code to take the details of the user.

Which isn't hard to do if you have a few things..